Worksheet Grade 8 English Language Arts

Sorrel Heights Lawn-Watering Limits: A Grade 8 Op-Ed Analysis

A grade 8 worksheet on a fictional town's op-ed about summer lawn-watering rules, where students find the claim, evidence, and counterclaim in the argument.

Objectives

  1. Students will identify a claim, its evidence, and the counterclaim in an op-ed.
  2. Students will cite the strongest single piece of support for the writer's position.

Vocabulary

Key words: claim, counterclaim, rebuttal, evidence

Teacher overview

Before students write their own arguments, it helps to take a short one apart. This worksheet gives students an original op-ed from a fictional town, built to contain a clear claim, real evidence, a counterclaim, and a rebuttal. Students locate each part and then judge which support is strongest, which is the harder and more valuable move. The worksheet prepares students for argument writing and works in either an ELA or a civics setting.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: The writer's claim is that Sorrel Heights should keep its summer lawn-watering rule. Any accurate paraphrase of that position earns credit.
  2. Answer: "I think the town should keep it." This sentence states the writer's position most directly.
  3. Answer: When many homes water at the same time on a hot afternoon, the combined demand can strain the pipes and drop the water pressure for the whole town, so a rule spreads the demand out.
  4. Answer: Any one of: "The average American household already uses about 300 gallons of water each day," or the point that heavy watering during a dry spell can leave a neighbor with weak pressure. Students must quote the evidence they choose.
  5. Answer: The counterclaim is that a green lawn is a resident's own business and the town should not tell people when to water. The stated sentence is: "Some residents argue that a green lawn is their own business and that the town should not tell them when to water."
  6. Answer: The writer answers that water is shared, so one home's heavy watering during a dry spell can lower a neighbor's pressure, which makes the timing rule a small and fair trade for a reliable supply.
  7. Answer: Agreeing for a moment shows the writer understands the other side and treats it fairly. This makes the writer seem reasonable and makes the rebuttal that follows more convincing.
  8. Answer: Answers will vary. A strong choice is the sentence about one home's watering lowering a neighbor's pressure, because it shows a direct harm to others, which supports a town-wide rule better than a general statement about water use. Students must justify their choice by comparing two sentences.
  9. Answer: It is mostly an argument. Supporting features include the stated claim, the counterclaim, and the rebuttal, which are parts of an argument rather than a plain explanation or a story.
  10. Answer: Answers will vary but should add a new opposing point, such as noting that residents who install their own rain barrels are already saving water and should be allowed to water when they choose.

Differentiation

Support

Give students a labeled organizer with four boxes: claim, evidence, counterclaim, and rebuttal. Having them drop each quotation into the right box before answering the analysis questions keeps the parts of the argument separate in their minds.

Extension

Ask students to write a two-paragraph response op-ed that states the opposite claim, includes one piece of evidence, and answers the strongest point the original writer made.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "claim," "counterclaim," "rebuttal," and "evidence" with a simple two-sided picture: one speaker making a point and another answering it. Allow students to answer items 2, 4, and 5 by underlining and copying the sentence rather than paraphrasing it.