Lab / experiment Grade 5 Engineering & Design

Fenmere Orchard Mulch Depth: A Grade 5 Water-Saving Fair Test

Teams weigh three soil cups over two days to find whether thin or thick mulch holds water better, then recommend a ring depth for a fictional orchard.

Objectives

  1. Students will hold soil, water, and location steady while changing only mulch depth.
  2. Students will subtract recorded masses to find how much water each cup lost.
  3. Students will recommend a mulch depth for an orchard working under a limited mulch supply.

Vocabulary

Evaporation
Evaporation happens when liquid water, often warmed by the sun, turns into an invisible gas called water vapor that rises into the air. It is how water leaves oceans, lakes, and puddles.

Also: mulch, mass, controlled variable, orchard

Teacher overview

The investigation question is whether covering soil with mulch keeps water in it, and if so, whether a thicker layer keeps more. The fictional Fenmere Orchard has young apple trees and a watering bill it wants to lower, so it has asked for a recommendation on how deep to build the mulch ring around each trunk. Teams set up three cups of the same soil with the same water, cover them with nothing, a thin layer, and a thick layer, and weigh them twice across two days. Mass lost is water lost, because nothing else leaves a cup sitting on a tray.

The misconception worth naming first is what the scale is actually measuring. Students who see a cup get lighter often say the soil dried out or the water sank in, as though the water moved somewhere inside the cup. Water leaving the cup by soaking downward is not possible here, since the cups have no holes, so the only route out is evaporation from the surface. Making that argument out loud, before the first weighing, is what turns the mass reading into evidence. A second point: teams frequently want to water all three cups again on day two because one looks dry. Doing so ends the test. The whole comparison depends on each cup receiving water exactly once, at the start.

This lab runs across two sessions: about 40 minutes to set up and take the first masses, then about 40 minutes two days later to take the second masses and complete the analysis.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: Results vary by team; the Bare cup is the usual answer.
    Accept any cup named as long as it carries the largest mass lost in that team's own table. If a mulched cup lost the most, ask the team whether that cup was placed near a vent or a window.
  2. Answer: Results vary by team; the Thick cup usually loses the least.
    Accept three subtractions that match the recorded masses, each labeled in grams, with the smallest difference named. Check that students subtracted Day 2 from Day 0 and not the reverse.
  3. Answer: Results vary by team.
    Accept any difference that equals the Bare cup's mass lost minus the Thick cup's mass lost, shown as a subtraction and labeled in grams. Many classes see a difference of a few grams over two days, which is small but consistent across teams.
  4. Answer: Results vary by team; both depths usually meet the rule.
    Accept any answer in which the depths named lost less mass than the Bare cup in that team's table, and accept a finding that only one depth met the rule when the data says so.
  5. Answer: The one change was the mulch depth.
    Accept any two controls the team actually held steady, such as the same soil, the same 50 milliliters of water, the same cup size, the same tray, or the same weighing times. Do not accept "the mulch" as a control, since mulch depth is the thing being tested.
  6. Answer: Accept either plan when the team gives a reason drawn from its own data.
    The 450 thin rings plan is the stronger answer in most classes, because the thin cup usually saves nearly as much water as the thick cup while covering all 400 trees instead of only 150. Accept the 150 thick rings plan if that team's data shows a large gap between thin and thick.
  7. Answer: Answers vary; accept any honest limit of the model paired with a matching fix.
    Common limits students name are that real soil drains downward while a sealed cup cannot, that real trees pull water up through their roots, that real weather brings rain, wind, and sun, and that a real mulch ring is far wider than a cup. Reasonable fixes include poking drain holes, planting a seedling in each cup, running the test outdoors, or extending the test past two days.

Differentiation

Support

Set up these teams' cups in advance, with the soil already leveled and the tape labels written, so their first task is pouring the measured water. Give them a recording sheet with the subtraction already framed as Day 0 minus Day 2 and a place-value chart for the decimal work. Reading the scale aloud to a partner who writes it down keeps the recording accurate.

Extension

Ask these teams to add a fourth cup with a mulch depth of their own choosing and to predict, before weighing, where it will land between the thin and thick results. They should also graph all four mass-lost values as a bar graph and describe whether adding more mulch keeps paying off at the same rate, which is a question a real orchard has to answer before buying another truckload.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "mulch," "mass," "evaporation," and "bare" using the actual materials and a drawing of water leaving a soil surface as arrows. Label each cup with both a word and a picture. Provide this frame for questions 4 and 6: "The ___ cup lost ___ grams, so I recommend ___ ." Allow students to record data as numbers only and to answer question 7 with a labeled sketch.

Extensions

Students can repeat the comparison outdoors in a garden bed or a large planter, where rain and sun are part of the test, and see whether the indoor result holds. A grower, a garden center employee, or a groundskeeper visiting the class can describe how deep they build mulch rings and why they keep mulch pulled back from the trunk, which is a design detail this cup test cannot show.