Project Grade 10 Health & Consumer Science

Linden Terrace Apartments: A Legionella Water Safety Plan

Teams rank Legionella risks in a fictional senior apartment building from its water log, plan flushing and temperature checks, and write a notice for residents.

Objectives

  1. Students will explain how Legionella bacteria grow in building water systems and how people are exposed, and identify who is at higher risk of Legionnaires' disease.
  2. Students will rank locations in a building by Legionella risk using a water log, and build a control plan that fits stated limits on staff time and money.
  3. Students will judge whether a one-sample test report supports a conclusion about a whole building.
  4. Students will write a resident health notice that is accurate, readable for older adults, and states what residents should do.

Vocabulary

Key words: Legionella, Legionnaires' disease, aerosol, stagnation, biofilm, flushing, scald, water management plan

Teacher overview

Legionnaires' disease is a serious lung infection caused by Legionella bacteria. The bacteria live naturally in lakes and streams at low levels, yet outbreaks are usually traced to building water systems: water heaters set too low, pipes where water sits unused, showerheads, spas, and decorative fountains. People become infected by breathing in fine mist that carries the bacteria rather than by drinking tap water in the ordinary way, and older adults are among the groups at highest risk. In this five-session project, teams act as advisers to Linden Terrace, a fictional apartment building for older adults in the fictional town of Stowhurst. Working from the building's water log, a price list, and a weekly limit on staff time, teams rank where the risk is, write a control plan, evaluate a testing company's report, and write a health notice for residents, then present all of it to the building's residents' council.

Teaching note: a common misconception is that Legionella is a drinking-water problem that a pitcher filter or bottled water would solve. The route of exposure is inhaled mist, so the showers, the spa, and the fountain matter far more than the kitchen tap, and students who rank the kitchen sink as the top risk have missed the central idea. A second misconception is that hotter water is always the safer choice. Hot water controls Legionella, yet water hot enough to do that can scald an older adult within seconds, so the building has to manage both risks at once; the price list includes anti-scald mixing valves for that reason. The temperature targets, prices, and staff times in the brief were set for this scenario. Real buildings set their own targets in a water management program that follows public health guidance, and a local health department sanitarian or a building facilities manager makes a good guest for the final session.

Rubric

Criterion Emerging Developing Proficient Advanced
Risk map and health reasoning Ranks locations without reasons, or ranks the kitchen sink as the top risk because people drink from it Gives reasons based on temperature alone and does not consider mist or who is exposed Ranks every location using growth conditions, mist, and the people exposed, and places the heater, the unused apartments, the far apartment, the spa, and the fountain above the used taps Does everything at the proficient level and explains how one problem, such as the low heater setting, raises the risk at several other locations
Control plan within the limits Plan is missing control steps for some high-risk locations, or its time or cost total is over the limit Plan covers the high-risk locations, but the schedule or budget is not added up or does not fit Plan covers every high-risk location, its weekly minutes total 180 or less, its cost totals $2,500 or less, and it explains how scalds are prevented Plan meets every limit and names a trade-off it made, such as closing the spa or leaving some valves for next year, with a health reason for the choice
Evaluation of the test report Accepts the report's conclusion or rejects it without a reason Notes one weakness, such as the single sample, without linking it to the conclusion Explains that one cold-water sample from a busy tap cannot show the whole building is safe, and names locations that should have been sampled Does everything at the proficient level and explains that even a well-chosen negative sample shows conditions at one time and place, while the log shows conditions that let Legionella grow
Resident health notice Notice has health errors or does not tell residents what to do Notice is accurate but long, crowded, or missing the steps to take after being away Notice is accurate, in large print and short sentences, and covers the risk, the building's actions, what to do after being away, and warning signs to report to a doctor Notice meets the proficient level and is organized so a reader can find each action at a glance, with headings or numbered steps that a trade-draft reader confirmed were clear
Presentation Presentation skips parts of the packet or cannot answer questions Presentation covers the packet but answers questions without evidence Presentation covers all four products within eight minutes and answers questions with evidence from the log Presentation does all of that and anticipates a likely resident concern, such as losing the spa or the fountain, before it is raised

Scoring reference for the teacher. High-risk locations in the log are the water heater outlet (below its target, which lowers hot water temperatures throughout the building), apartment 212 (months of stagnant water at 96°F with rust, which suggests sediment and biofilm), apartment 318 (weeks unused, warm hot water, and scale in the showerhead, with a resident who will shower on return), apartment 407 (occupied, with hot water at 109°F in the growth range at every shower), the spa (warm water, heavy mist from the jets, and disinfectant checked only weekly), and the fountain (warm recirculating water that sprays mist in a room everyone walks through). Apartment 104 and the kitchen sink are low risk because they meet the targets and are used daily; accept a medium ranking for either if the team gives a reason. One plan that fits the limits flushes apartments 212 and 318 twice a week (4 × 15 = 60 minutes), tests the spa twice a day (14 × 5 = 70 minutes), checks temperatures at the heater and apartment 407 twice a week (4 × 5 = 20 minutes), and cleans one showerhead a week in rotation (20 minutes), for 170 minutes. Its fixes are twelve mixing valves (12 × $150 = $1,800), which allow the heater to go back to 140°F, the plant display in place of the fountain ($300), three new showerheads for apartments 212, 318, and 407 (3 × $25 = $75), and three follow-up lab samples from apartment 212, apartment 407, and the spa (3 × $90 = $270), for a fictional total of $2,445. Strong teams using this approach also notice that the lobby kitchen sink has no mixing valve and add a hot-water caution sign there once the heater setting goes up. Accept other plans that meet both limits and give health reasons. A strong notice tells residents to let staff know before they return from being away so the apartment can be flushed, or, if they flush it themselves, to run the hot and cold water in the shower and at every tap until the hot water is fully hot and the cold water is fully cold, stepping out of the bathroom while the shower runs so they do not breathe the mist. It also tells them to call a doctor promptly about cough, fever, or shortness of breath and mention any recent spa use.

Differentiation

Support

Give teams a partly completed three-column chart for Session 1 with two locations already placed, and a planning table for Session 3 that lists each high-risk location with blank cells for the control step, minutes, and cost. Provide a notice template with four headings (What is happening, What we are doing, What you should do, When to call a doctor) so teams can focus on accurate content and plain wording.

Extension

Ask teams to write a one-page memo to the building owner explaining what the fictional budget could not cover this year and what they would ask for next year, such as a plumber's review of why hot water reaches apartment 407 so slowly. Teams can also draft a sampling plan for the certified lab that says which outlets to test, whether to sample hot or cold water, and when, with a reason for each choice.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "stagnant," "biofilm," "mist," "scald," and "flush" with a labeled drawing of a bathroom that shows the showerhead, the mixing valve, and the mist in the air. Allow teams to draft the resident notice in the home language first and then in English, and offer sentence frames for the risk map such as "This location is high risk because the water is __ and people breathe mist when __."

Extensions

Students can compare the Linden Terrace plan with the needs of another building type, such as a hotel, a hospital wing, or their own school's locker rooms, and explain which parts of the plan would change for that building and why. A local health department's environmental health staff can be invited to explain how they respond when a case of Legionnaires' disease is reported and how they trace it to a building.