Worksheet Grade 7 English Language Arts

Buffer Strips on Cattail Bend Creek: Claim and Counterclaim

A grade 7 worksheet pairing two opinion letters about mandatory buffer strips on a fictional creek, asking students to identify claims, evidence, and counterclaims.

Objectives

  1. Students will identify the claim and supporting evidence in two opinion letters about the same issue.
  2. Students will identify a counterclaim and explain how it challenges an opposing claim.
  3. Students will draft a sentence that acknowledges an opposing claim in argument writing.

Vocabulary

Key words: claim, counterclaim, evidence, buffer strip

Teacher overview

Cattail Bend Creek is a fictional stream that runs behind three family farms before it reaches a town swimming hole. This worksheet pairs two short opinion letters written for the town council: one favors requiring buffer strips along the creek, and one opposes a mandatory requirement. A common misconception this worksheet corrects directly: students often assume the "winning" argument is the one stated most forcefully, when a stronger argument is one that anticipates and responds to the other side's strongest point.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: The town council should require every farm within a half mile of the creek to plant a 30-foot buffer strip along the water.
  2. Answer: Any two of the following: the fictional Watershed Council found rising nitrate levels during planting season; nutrient pollution reduces the oxygen fish need to survive; farmers in nearby towns who use buffer strips have seen cleaner water within a few years.
  3. Answer: The town should offer a voluntary, cost-share program instead of requiring buffer strips by law.
  4. Answer: A mandatory buffer strip would take productive land out of every farm near the creek, land families depend on for income.
  5. Answer: The counterclaim is that requiring buffer strips by law would unfairly cost farmers productive land and income without sharing that cost across the community.
  6. Answer: No, Letter 1 does not address the concern about lost farmland; it focuses only on the environmental and community benefits of buffer strips.
  7. Answer: Answers will vary and should name a specific piece of evidence from either letter along with a reason it is convincing, such as the connection between nutrients and fish oxygen levels, or the fairness argument about shared cost.
  8. Answer: Wording will vary; an acceptable sentence acknowledges the farmer's concern, such as: "We recognize that a required buffer strip asks farmers to give up land they depend on, which is why a cost-share option should be part of any plan."
  9. Answer: Understanding both claims and their evidence helps the council weigh the creek's health against farmers' livelihoods fairly, instead of deciding based on only one side's reasoning.

Differentiation

Support (below grade level)

Provide a two-column graphic organizer labeled "Claim" and "Evidence" for each letter, and let students fill it in before attempting items 1 through 4, so the counterclaim questions build on work they have already completed.

Extension (above grade level)

Ask students to write a short third letter, no more than five sentences, from a town council member who proposes a compromise between the two positions, citing at least one piece of evidence from each original letter.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "claim," "counterclaim," "evidence," and "buffer strip" with simple definitions and a labeled sketch of a creek with a grassy strip beside a farm field. Allow students to answer items 1, 3, and 5 with short phrases rather than full sentences.