Worksheet Grade 9 Math

Saltmarsh Bend's RO Membrane: Reading a Permeate-Flow Decline Table

A grade 9 worksheet where students read a reverse-osmosis membrane's permeate-flow data table, finding key features and average rate of change during fouling.

Objectives

  1. Students will identify the intercept, the decreasing interval, and the average rate of change from a table of permeate-flow readings.
  2. Students will use a data table's average rate of change to predict when a quantity will cross a stated minimum value.

Vocabulary

Key words: permeate, fouling, intercept, average rate of change

Teacher overview

At the fictional Saltmarsh Bend desalination plant, high-pressure pumps push water through a reverse-osmosis membrane, a thin barrier that holds back salt, producing clean "permeate" water on the other side. Over weeks of operation, tiny particles build up on the membrane's surface in a process called fouling, which gradually reduces how much permeate flow the membrane can produce until the plant runs a cleaning procedure to restore it. This worksheet has students read a table of one membrane's weekly flow readings during a single fouling cycle and answer questions about the pattern the same way an operator monitoring the plant's dashboard would.

A common misconception is assuming that any declining number must be an exponential decay, when in this membrane's data the flow actually drops by the same amount each week, a linear pattern. Students should look at the differences between consecutive readings, not just the fact that the numbers are getting smaller, before deciding what kind of pattern they are looking at.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: 500 gpm.
    The Week 0 value is the permeate flow measured right after the membrane's most recent cleaning, before any fouling has reduced it. This is the table's intercept, the starting value of the pattern.

  2. Answer: decreasing every week, Week 0 through Week 6.
    Each week's flow is 15 gpm lower than the week before (500, 485, 470, 455, 440, 425, 410), so the flow decreases steadily across the entire table.

  3. Answer: -15 gpm per week.
    (410 gpm − 500 gpm) ÷ (6 weeks − 0 weeks) = -90 ÷ 6 = -15 gpm per week.

  4. Answer: Week 6.
    The table shows 425 gpm at Week 5, still above the 420 gpm minimum, and 410 gpm at Week 6, which is below it. Week 6 is the first week the flow drops below the minimum.

  5. Answer: a straight line sloping downward.
    The graph would start at 500 gpm on the vertical axis at Week 0 and fall in a straight line to 410 gpm at Week 6, because the flow decreases by the same 15 gpm every week rather than curving.

  6. Answer: each fouling cycle is its own separate pattern.
    Once the plant cleans the membrane, the flow resets to a new starting value and a new decline begins, so the straight-line pattern found for Weeks 0 through 6 does not apply to the weeks after cleaning. Restricting the domain to Week 0 through Week 6 keeps the model accurate to the one cycle it actually describes.

  7. Answer: 91 percent.
    455 gpm ÷ 500 gpm = 0.91, or 91 percent of the original flow remains at Week 3.

  8. Answer: 5 gpm in reserve at Week 5, versus 10 gpm below the minimum at Week 6.
    At Week 5, the flow is 425 gpm, which is 5 gpm above the 420 gpm minimum. At Week 6, the flow is 410 gpm, which is 10 gpm below the minimum. Scheduling the cleaning at Week 5 keeps the plant above its minimum the whole time, a 15 gpm difference in outcome compared with waiting until Week 6.

  9. Answer: Week 8.
    500 gpm − 10 gpm per week × 8 weeks = 500 − 80 = 420 gpm, so the second membrane first reaches the 420 gpm minimum in Week 8.

  10. Answer: answers vary; must reference proactive scheduling.
    A strong answer explains that once staff know the flow drops by a predictable 15 gpm each week, they can calculate ahead of time which future week the flow will first fall below the minimum and schedule the cleaning-in-place procedure before that week arrives, rather than discovering the problem only after flow has already dropped too low.

Differentiation

Support (below grade level)

Provide a printed grid with the axes already labeled and scaled for this fictional plant's data (Week 0-6 on the horizontal axis, 400-500 gpm on the vertical axis) so students can plot the table's points directly instead of estimating a scale themselves. Walk through problem 3's rate-of-change calculation as a class example before releasing problems 4 through 10.

Extension (above grade level)

Ask students to write the equation of the line describing this membrane's flow as a function of week number (using their answer from problem 3 as the slope and the Week 0 value as the starting point), then use that equation to predict the flow at Week 4.5, a value not shown directly in the table.

ELL supports

Pair the vocabulary terms "permeate," "fouling," and "intercept" with a simple labeled diagram of a membrane with clean water passing through one side and particles building up on the other. Allow students to answer problems 2, 5, and 6 with a hand-drawn sketch plus short phrases instead of full sentences.