Project Grade 11 Science

Umberly Reservoir: Testing Covers Against Evaporation

A five-session grade 11 investigation where teams run a randomized evaporation-pan experiment, test it with a simulation, and scale the result to a fictional reservoir.

Objectives

  1. Students will design and run a randomized experiment comparing two evaporation treatments.
  2. Students will use a reshuffling simulation to judge whether a measured difference is larger than chance.
  3. Students will build a spreadsheet water budget and scale an experimental result to a reservoir.

Vocabulary

Evaporation
Evaporation happens when liquid water, often warmed by the sun, turns into an invisible gas called water vapor that rises into the air. It is how water leaves oceans, lakes, and puddles.
Water budget
A water budget is a way of tracking all the water coming into an area, like rain and snowmelt, against all the water leaving it, like evaporation and streamflow. Scientists use water budgets to see whether a watershed or aquifer is gaining or losing water over time.

Also: randomized assignment, control treatment, replication, reshuffling simulation

Teacher overview

A reservoir in a dry climate can lose a large share of its stored water to the air before anyone drinks a drop of it, and covering part of the surface is one of the few ways to reduce that loss. In this five-session project, teams run a randomized pan experiment comparing a covered treatment with an open control, test the difference with a reshuffling simulation, and scale the result to a fictional reservoir with a spreadsheet water budget. The reshuffling simulation is required rather than optional, because a difference between two group means is not evidence of an effect until it has been compared with the differences that chance alone produces. The final deliverables are a written data report, a working spreadsheet, and a short presentation to a fictional water district board.

Rubric

Criterion Emerging Developing Proficient Advanced
Experimental design Treatments assigned by convenience, few pans, no controlled variables listed Meets the pan count but randomization or controlled variables are incomplete Meets every stated constraint, with randomization and controlled variables documented Meets every constraint and explains why each control matters for this measurement
Data quality Measurements are irregular or partly missing Most days recorded, with gaps left unexplained Complete daily record with the rain rule applied as written Complete record with measurement uncertainty estimated and its effect on the result stated
Simulation and inference No simulation attempted Simulation run but the result is not interpreted Simulation run correctly and the observed difference placed against the simulated distribution Interpretation states what the simulation can and cannot establish about cause
Reservoir model No working spreadsheet Spreadsheet exists but formulas are entered as fixed numbers Traceable formulas, correct conversion to acre-feet, and all three scenarios present Model also shows how the answer changes if the covered share or the measured reduction is different
Communication to the client Presentation does not answer the board's questions Answers some questions, with unsupported claims Answers all three board questions with evidence from the team's own data Answers all three, states the limits of a pan experiment, and recommends what to measure next

Differentiation

Support

Give these teams a pre-built protocol form with the variable categories labeled and the pan layout drawn, so their planning work is to fill in choices rather than to invent a format. Provide the spreadsheet with the column headings and the acre-foot conversion already in place, and pair the team with the teacher for the first ten reshuffles before they continue alone.

Extension

Ask these teams to add a third treatment, such as a partial cover or a light-colored floating material, and to compare all three with the same simulation method. They can also add a wind measurement and test whether daily loss tracks temperature or wind more closely, then explain what that means for scaling a small pan up to an open reservoir.

ELL supports

Pre-teach evaporation, treatment, control, replication, and water budget with a labeled diagram of a pan and a reservoir side by side. Provide the sentence frames "We assigned the cover to ___ pans by ___" and "Our observed difference was ___ than most of the simulated differences, which means ___." Allow the protocol to be drafted in the home language and translated before approval.

Extensions

Have teams find the reported surface area of a real reservoir near their community and describe what information they would need to estimate its annual evaporation loss. Teams can also write a short memo explaining why a district might prefer to reduce demand rather than cover a surface, and what evidence would settle the question.