Lab / experiment Grade 3 Science

Lumbry Bend's Water Wheel: A Grade 3 Pour-Height Fair Test

A grade 3 lab in which teams build a cork water wheel and test whether pouring one liter from a greater height makes the wheel spin more times in ten seconds.

Objectives

  1. Students will build a small water wheel and set it up so it spins freely.
  2. Students will run a fair test that changes only the pour height while the water stays at one liter.
  3. Students will compare spin counts across three pour heights and name their controlled variables.

Vocabulary

Key words: water wheel, axle, blade, fair test, trial, pour height

Teacher overview

At a dam, water falls from the lake behind the wall down to a wheel below, and the spinning wheel drives a generator that makes electricity. This lab asks a single testable question about that arrangement: does pouring the same amount of water from a greater height make a small wheel spin more times? Teams build a cork wheel with index-card blades and run three trials at each of three pour heights, holding the water at one liter every time. The mill at Lumbry Bend named in the title is a fictional setting for the investigation, and the classroom wheel is a simple model rather than a working generator.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: Answers will vary by team. Accept any whole number the team actually recorded for the first trial at 10 cm. Classroom cork wheels commonly land somewhere between 3 and 15 spins in 10 seconds, so a count far outside that range is worth a second look at the setup.
  2. Answer: Usually 50 cm. Accept whichever height the team's own table shows as highest. Water falling farther arrives faster and pushes the blades harder, so the tallest pour normally wins, though a wobbly stand can flip the result.
  3. Answer: Answers will vary by team. Accept any difference that matches the team's own table when the lowest count is subtracted from the highest count. Check the subtraction rather than the size of the number.
  4. Answer: To keep the test fair. Accept any answer explaining that a bigger pour would push the wheel more on its own, so the team could not tell whether the height or the extra water caused the change.
  5. Answer: Accept any real control from the setup, including the same wheel, the same six blades, the same tub, the same steady pouring speed, the same 10-second count, or the same person doing the pouring.
  6. Answer: Accept any failure the team recorded, such as the skewer jumping out of a notch, a blade bending flat, tape coming loose, or the wheel rubbing on a cup. Accept any repair that made the wheel spin freely again, and accept "no failures" from a team whose setup held together.
  7. Answer: Tall. Accept any answer that uses the team's own counts to argue that a taller drop turned the wheel more times. A team whose data came out the other way should be credited for arguing from what they measured, with a note about what may have gone wrong.

Differentiation

Support

Build the cork wheels and the notched cup stands ahead of time so these students begin at Step 5 with a working setup. Give them a counting card with 20 printed boxes to check off one at a time as the dot passes, and reduce the test to two heights, 10 cm and 50 cm, with two trials each.

Extension

Ask students to run a second fair test that holds the pour height at 50 cm and changes only the number of blades, using three blades, six blades, and nine blades. They should predict the result first, keep the water at one liter, and explain which of the two tests told them more about how to improve the wheel.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "blade," "axle," "spin," and "pour" by turning a completed wheel by hand and naming each part as students touch it. Post a picture strip of the ten steps at each station. Provide the frames "At ___ cm the wheel spun ___ times" and "We kept ___ the same every time."