Classroom activity Grade 11 Social Studies & Civics

Vireo's Next Acre-Foot: A Grade 11 Water Supply Planning Activity

A grade 11 simulation where teams plan a fictional city's new water supply by marginal cost, choosing among conservation, reuse, and desalination options.

Objectives

  1. Students will build a least-cost water supply portfolio that meets a fixed target.
  2. Students will distinguish the marginal cost of the last acre-foot from the average cost of the whole plan.
  3. Students will defend a supply choice using cost and at least one non-cost factor.

Vocabulary

Acre-foot
The amount of water it takes to cover one acre of land, about the size of a football field, one foot deep. Western states use acre-feet to measure large amounts of water.
Desalination
Turning salty water, like ocean water, into fresh water people can use. It works, but it takes a lot of energy and leaves behind very salty water that must be handled carefully.

Also: marginal cost, average cost, water reuse, portfolio

Teacher overview

This is a team decision simulation for groups of three or four, run in a single class period. Each team acts as the water-planning staff of the fictional city of Vireo, which must secure 20,000 acre-feet of new water each year. Teams choose among four supply options, each with a stated yield and a stated cost per acre-foot, and the activity teaches the core economic idea directly: because the cheapest options are limited, meeting the target forces teams up a cost ladder, so the marginal cost of the last acre-foot is higher than the average cost of the whole plan. A council round then adds a real-world complication and makes teams revise.

Activity Directions

  1. Set up (5 min): Divide the class into water-planning teams of three or four. Give each team the supply-option handout and recording sheet for the fictional city of Vireo. Explain the goal: assemble supply options that total exactly 20,000 acre-feet per year at the lowest annual cost.
  2. Teach the core move (5 min): Explain marginal cost with a quick example: if a team has already bought the cheapest water available and still needs more, the next acre-foot must come from a costlier source, so each additional block of supply tends to cost more than the last.
  3. Build the portfolio (12 min): Teams select options in any order but should discover that starting with the lowest cost per acre-foot minimizes total cost. They record the yield taken from each option (a source may be used partially) until the selected yields sum to 20,000 acre-feet.
  4. Compute (8 min): Each team calculates the total annual cost of its plan, the average cost per acre-foot (total cost divided by 20,000), and the marginal cost of its final acre-foot (the cost of the most expensive source it had to tap).
  5. Council round (10 min): Announce a complication for the fictional city of Vireo: a drought cuts the conservation option's available yield in half, so teams must replace that lost water from a costlier source. Teams revise their portfolios and recompute the total and marginal cost.
  6. Debrief (10 min): Teams report their plans. Close with two questions tied to the activity: why did the marginal cost of the last acre-foot end up higher than the average cost, and which non-cost factor would most change your ranking of the options? Use the answer key to confirm the least-cost figures.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: Least-cost portfolio: 6,000 acre-feet conservation, 5,000 acre-feet leak repair, 7,000 acre-feet reuse, and 2,000 acre-feet desalination, which sums to 20,000 acre-feet. Taking the cheapest sources first minimizes total cost.
  2. Answer: $28,600,000 total. The costs are 6,000 times $700 ($4,200,000), 5,000 times $1,100 ($5,500,000), 7,000 times $1,900 ($13,300,000), and 2,000 times $2,800 ($5,600,000), which sum to $28,600,000.
  3. Answer: $1,430 per acre-foot average. $28,600,000 divided by 20,000 acre-feet equals $1,430 per acre-foot.
  4. Answer: $2,800 per acre-foot marginal cost. The last and most expensive source tapped is desalination, so the final acre-foot costs $2,800, well above the $1,430 average.
  5. Answer: The marginal cost exceeds the average because the cheap options run out; once conservation, leak repair, and reuse are exhausted, the target can only be met with costlier desalination, which pulls the last unit's cost above the blended average.
  6. Answer: Council-round result: replacing 3,000 lost conservation acre-feet with desalination raises desalination use to 5,000 acre-feet and the total to about $34,900,000. Reasonable non-cost factors include drought reliability, energy use and brine disposal for desalination, public acceptance of reuse, and how the cost is shared among ratepayers.

Differentiation

Support

Give teams a partially filled recording sheet with the conservation and leak-repair rows already computed, so they only complete the reuse and desalination rows and the totals. Provide a worked marginal-versus-average example before step 3.

Extension

Ask teams to add a fifth option they research using only the handout's logic, such as a higher-cost but drought-proof source, assign it a plausible yield and cost, and explain how adding it changes the least-cost portfolio and the marginal cost.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "marginal cost," "average cost," "acre-foot," "reuse," and "desalination" with a simple ladder diagram showing each source stacked from cheapest to most expensive. Allow teams to present their plan using the recording sheet and short phrases rather than a full spoken explanation.