Project Grades 6–7 Engineering & Design

Schoolyard Stormwater Runoff: An Audit and Design Project

Teams map their schoolyard's hard and soft surfaces, calculate real stormwater runoff in gallons, trace where it drains, and pitch a fix to a real school decision-maker.

Objectives

  1. Classify schoolyard surfaces as impervious or pervious and represent them accurately on a scale site map.
  2. Estimate surface area by pacing and apply the area-times-rainfall runoff conversion to calculate gallons of stormwater a 1-inch storm produces.
  3. Trace the path stormwater follows from a surface to its point of discharge, connecting the schoolyard to its larger watershed.
  4. Design a stormwater improvement, justify it with a cost-benefit comparison, and pitch it in writing and in person to a real school decision-maker.

Vocabulary

Impervious surface
An impervious surface is any hard surface, like a road, roof, or parking lot, that rain cannot soak through. The more impervious surface a town has, the more stormwater rushes off it.
Watershed
A watershed is all the land where rain that falls will drain to the same stream, river, or lake. Everyone lives in a watershed, no matter how far from the water they live.
Storm drain
A storm drain is the grate at the edge of a street that swallows rainwater and sends it through pipes to the nearest creek or river. That water is usually not treated, so only rain belongs down the drain.
Rain garden
A rain garden is a shallow planted dip in the ground that catches rain running off a roof or driveway and lets it soak slowly into the soil. Its deep-rooted plants help clean the water.
Downspout
A downspout is the pipe that carries rainwater down from a roof's gutters to the ground. Where that water goes next, whether onto a lawn, into a rain barrel, or straight to a storm drain, makes a big difference in how much runoff a property sends downstream.

Also: pervious surface, runoff, cost-benefit

Teacher overview

Every schoolyard functions as a small watershed. This five-session project turns the campus into the site of a stormwater audit: teams measure how much of the ground sheds rain instead of absorbing it, calculate the gallons a single storm produces, determine where that water goes once it leaves school property, and design an improvement to propose to the people who could put it into practice.

The audience for this project is real rather than simulated. Milestone 5 asks each team to send a real letter to the principal or facilities manager and deliver a short spoken pitch to an actual decision-maker. Because the letters are genuine correspondence, they need a review pass before they leave the classroom; build a few minutes into session 4 or the start of session 5 to read drafts and catch anything that would misstate a fact about the building or embarrass a team.

A specific misconception to watch for during Milestone 2: students routinely treat grass, mulch, and other soft surfaces as producing zero runoff, so they leave them out of their totals entirely. Soft surfaces slow and absorb far more water than pavement or roofing, but they are not runoff-proof, especially once soil is saturated or the ground slopes. Drainage engineers themselves assign turf a runoff coefficient of roughly 0.2 rather than 0 in their own calculations, and they treat pavement's coefficient of roughly 0.9 as high but not absolute. This project's math only asks students to calculate gallons from hard, impervious surfaces using the direct area-times-rainfall conversion, so a team's total will legitimately undercount total site runoff by some amount. That is fine for the project's purpose, but if a team declares that a whole field produces zero runoff and should be ignored, that is the moment to reopen the conversation about the low corner of turf that floods every time it rains hard.

Expect the site walk in Milestone 3 to be the most unpredictable and valuable session. Building custodians and facilities staff usually know where water pools and where drains clog, and most are glad to be asked. Consider inviting one to walk with a group during Milestone 3 or to answer a team's questions before the Milestone 4 design session, since their knowledge will catch mistakes no map can reveal.

Rubric

Criterion 4 — Exceeds 3 — Meets 2 — Approaching 1 — Beginning
Surface mapping Every surface on site is captured, correctly labeled hard or soft, with slope noted wherever relevant Map is complete and every surface is correctly labeled hard or soft Map has a few missing or mislabeled surfaces Map is incomplete or most surfaces are mislabeled
Runoff math (method and accuracy) Every hard surface shows correct area and runoff work using the area-times-rainfall-times-0.623 method, with a reasonable, well-justified total The correct method is applied to every hard surface with only minor arithmetic slips Method is applied inconsistently, or some surfaces are missing from the total The formula is misapplied or missing; totals cannot be traced to any shown work
Drain hunt and flow tracing Flow paths for all hard surfaces are traced to a specific drain or outlet, with a well-reasoned account of the watershed connection Flow paths are traced for most surfaces to a plausible drain or outlet Some drains or outlets are found, but flow paths are guessed without site evidence No drains are found and there is no attempt to trace flow
Design proposal The design directly addresses evidence from Milestones 2 and 3, with clearly stated criteria and constraints and a realistic, well-quantified cost-benefit comparison The design addresses a real problem the team found, with stated criteria and a reasonable cost-benefit comparison The design is generic or loosely connected to the team's own site evidence There is no clear design and no cost-benefit reasoning
Pitch and communication The letter and oral pitch are professional, specific, evidence-based, and make a clear, persuasive ask The letter and pitch are clear, organized, and reference the team's evidence The letter or pitch is present but vague, disorganized, or missing evidence There is no letter or pitch, or the pitch does not reference the project's findings

Differentiation

Support (below grade level)

Provide a pre-drawn base map with the school building's outline already in place, so students only need to add and label surfaces rather than draw the whole footprint from scratch. For the runoff math, give a filled-in formula card, "area times rainfall times 0.623 equals gallons," and allow a calculator for every step. Before Milestone 2, give struggling teams one already-solved example (a 500-square-foot patio produces about 312 gallons in a 1-inch storm) and ask them to find the runoff for a 1,000-square-foot patio, so they practice scaling the formula before tackling their own irregular measurements. Pair a support team with a stronger team for the Milestone 3 site walk so no group works the drain hunt alone.

Extension (above grade level)

Ask advanced teams to recalculate their total runoff using a heavier storm depth drawn from a real regional rainfall record, since downpours of 2 or 3 inches are common in many regions, and compare how their proposed improvement's benefit changes at that scale. Teams can also research whether their community offers a stormwater fee credit or rebate program for property owners who install green infrastructure, and add a paragraph to the pitch letter estimating whether their proposal could qualify the school for one.

ELL supports

Pre-teach impervious, pervious, runoff, watershed, and downspout using photographs of each surface type taken from the actual school building, shown before the Milestone 1 walk. In the Project Brief, keep the three numbers in the worked example, 2,000, 1, and 0.623, visibly highlighted so the operation (multiply three values) is visible even before every surrounding word is understood. Allow the Milestone 5 letter to be planned or drafted in a student's strongest language first, with a partner or teacher supporting translation into the final version that gets sent.

Extensions

If your district or city offers a stormwater fee credit, rebate, or green-infrastructure grant program, help one team submit their proposal for consideration beyond the classroom pitch. Compare your schoolyard's hard-surface footprint with a neighboring school's, or with your own school's footprint from years ago using older aerial photos, to see whether paved area has grown or shrunk over time.