Project Grade 10 Math

Duncannon Elevated Tank: A Storage and Pressure Design Project

A four-session grade 10 project where teams size an elevated tank for a fictional town to meet storage, pressure-range and budget limits at low cost.

Objectives

  1. Students will size a cylindrical tank to meet a required storage volume in gallons.
  2. Students will set a tower height and water depth that keep pressure at the highest homes between 45 and 80 psi as the tank drains and fills.
  3. Students will compare candidate designs against a materials budget and choose a viable one.

Vocabulary

Key words: elevated tank, head, storage volume, surface area, budget constraint

Teacher overview

The town of Duncannon, a fictional town used for this project, is growing and needs a new elevated storage tank that holds enough water and keeps pressure in an acceptable range at the homes on its highest streets, whether the tank is nearly empty or full. Over four sessions, teams design a cylindrical tank and its supporting tower to meet a storage target, a pressure range and a fixed materials budget, then present the design to a fictional Duncannon Water Board. The work joins cylinder geometry, the pressure-height relationship operators use, and the cost tradeoff between a tall, narrow tank and a short, wide one.

Rubric

Criterion Emerging Developing Proficient Advanced
Storage constraint The design does not reach 500,000 gallons or shows no volume work The volume is calculated but does not clearly clear the 500,000-gallon minimum The tank clearly holds at least 500,000 gallons with the volume calculation shown The tank meets the storage minimum with a stated margin and the team explains why they chose that margin
Pressure range The tower height is missing, the tower is under 104 feet, or the full water surface is above 184 feet Both heights are stated, but the link to 45 psi and 80 psi is unclear or only one end of the range is checked The tower is at least 104 feet, the full water surface is at most 184 feet, and the team shows the 0.433 conversion for both the nearly empty and the full tank The team meets the pressure range and explains why a taller tower raises pressure at both water levels and reduces the water depth the tank may use
Budget and cost analysis Total cost is over budget or not itemized Cost is itemized but not clearly at or below 1,500,000 dollars An itemized cost at or below budget is shown for the chosen design The itemized cost is at or below budget and the team uses its cost table to explain how the tank's shape (narrow and deep or wide and shallow) affected the cost
Proposal and presentation The proposal is incomplete or hard to follow The proposal covers the design but omits one constraint The proposal clearly reports storage, pressure, and cost against all three constraints The proposal reports all three constraints clearly and anticipates a likely question from the water board

Reference values for checking team work. Every design below uses a 104-foot tower, which costs 104 × 9,000 = 936,000 dollars and gives 104 × 0.433 = 45.0 psi when the tank is nearly empty. Depths are rounded up to the next whole foot so each tank clears 66,845 cubic feet. A team that chooses a taller tower adds 9,000 dollars for each extra foot and loses one foot of allowed water depth for each extra foot of tower. Team answers may differ from these values by a few dollars or square feet because of rounding.

Diameter (ft) Depth (ft) Volume (cu ft) Surface area (sq ft) Shell cost ($) Total cost ($) Full surface (ft) Full-tank pressure (psi) Viable?
25 137 67,216 11,741 528,354 1,464,354 241 104.4 No, full surface above 184 ft
30 95 67,118 10,367 466,494 1,402,494 199 86.2 No, full surface above 184 ft
40 54 67,824 9,298 418,403 1,354,403 158 68.4 Yes
44 44 66,869 9,122 410,474 1,346,474 148 64.1 Yes, lowest cost in this table
50 35 68,688 9,423 424,025 1,360,025 139 60.2 Yes (the worked example)
60 24 67,824 10,176 457,915 1,393,915 128 55.4 Yes
70 18 69,237 11,651 524,313 1,460,313 122 52.8 Yes
80 14 70,336 13,567 610,496 1,546,496 118 51.1 No, over budget

Differentiation

Support

Provide the target conversions already worked out (the storage minimum in cubic feet, the 104-foot minimum tower height and the 184-foot ceiling on the full water surface) so teams can begin at Session 2 focused on design. Give a simplified reference sheet with the volume and surface-area formulas and the worked example from the Project Brief to model the calculation steps, and suggest a starting diameter between 40 and 60 feet.

Extension

Ask teams to find the tank diameter and depth that meet the storage minimum at the lowest total materials cost. Because the tower must be at least 104 feet tall whatever the tank's shape, the tower cost is fixed at 936,000 dollars, so the question becomes which shape needs the least shell steel for 66,845 cubic feet. Teams write depth in terms of diameter from the volume formula, substitute it into the surface-area formula to get cost as a function of diameter alone, and graph or tabulate that function. They should find a minimum near a diameter of 44 feet and a depth of 44 feet, for a total cost of about 1,346,500 dollars. Teams then explain, using their cost table, why a very tall thin tank (large side area) and a very short wide tank (large top and bottom) both cost more than a balanced design, and note that the tallest thin tanks also fail the 184-foot pressure ceiling.

ELL supports

Provide a labeled side-view diagram naming the tower, the tank, the tank floor, the water surface when full, the water depth, and the height above the ground. Pre-teach "storage," "head," "surface area," "pressure range," and "budget" with the diagram, and allow the written proposal to pair short labeled sketches with brief sentences rather than full paragraphs.