Math problem set Grade 11 Science

Winterset Well 6: Fitting a Regression Line to a Nitrate Trend

Grade 11 students fit a regression line to fictional groundwater nitrate readings, predict a future value, and compute a correlation coefficient.

Objectives

  1. Students will calculate the mean and deviations needed to fit a least-squares regression line to a two-variable data set.
  2. Students will use a regression equation to predict a future value and evaluate a residual.
  3. Students will compute and interpret a correlation coefficient.

Vocabulary

Key words: regression line, residual, correlation coefficient, slope, intercept

Teacher overview

Winterset (a fictional town created for this problem set) monitors a groundwater well, called Well 6, near farmland every two years for nitrate-nitrogen, and this problem set uses five of those readings to fit a least-squares regression line and judge how well it predicts the trend. A common misconception this math is designed to correct: students often treat a correlation coefficient close to 1 as proof that every data point sits exactly on the line, when even a very strong linear relationship, like Well 6's, still has small nonzero residuals at nearly every point.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: x̄ = 4, ȳ = 5.5 mg/L. x̄ = (0+2+4+6+8) ÷ 5 = 20 ÷ 5 = 4. ȳ = (3.0+4.0+5.5+7.0+8.0) ÷ 5 = 27.5 ÷ 5 = 5.5.
  2. Answer: listed in order from 2016 to 2024. (x − x̄): −4, −2, 0, 2, 4. (y − ȳ): −2.5, −1.5, 0, 1.5, 2.5.
  3. Answer: Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 26; Σ(x − x̄)² = 40. Products: (−4)(−2.5)=10, (−2)(−1.5)=3, (0)(0)=0, (2)(1.5)=3, (4)(2.5)=10; sum = 26. Squares: 16, 4, 0, 4, 16; sum = 40.
  4. Answer: 0.65 mg/L per year. b = 26 ÷ 40 = 0.65, meaning Well 6's nitrate-N level rises by about 0.65 mg/L for each additional year.
  5. Answer: y = 2.9 + 0.65x. a = 5.5 − (0.65 × 4) = 5.5 − 2.6 = 2.9.
  6. Answer: 12.0 mg/L. y = 2.9 + 0.65(14) = 2.9 + 9.1 = 12.0 mg/L.
  7. Answer: 2028. Solving 10 = 2.9 + 0.65x gives x = 7.1 ÷ 0.65 ≈ 10.92, which falls between the 2026 sample (x=10: y = 2.9+6.5 = 9.4 mg/L, below 10) and the 2028 sample (x=12: y = 2.9+7.8 = 10.7 mg/L, at or above 10), so 2028 is the first even sampling year the predicted value reaches 10 mg/L.
  8. Answer: 0.2 mg/L. Predicted value at x=6: y = 2.9 + 0.65(6) = 2.9+3.9 = 6.8 mg/L. Residual = actual − predicted = 7.0 − 6.8 = 0.2 mg/L, a small positive residual showing the actual 2022 reading sat only slightly above the line's prediction, so the line fits closely at that point.
  9. Answer: 0.997. r = 26 ÷ √(40 × 17) = 26 ÷ √680 ≈ 26 ÷ 26.077 ≈ 0.997, which rounds to 0.997 and shows a very strong positive linear relationship between year and nitrate-N level.

Differentiation

Support (below grade level)

Provide the deviation table from item 2 already completed, so students begin at item 3 with the values ready to sum. Provide the regression-line and correlation-coefficient formulas printed with each symbol labeled in plain language.

Extension (above grade level)

Ask students to calculate r² from their answer to item 9 and explain, in their own words, what percent of the variation in nitrate-N level the regression line accounts for, then connect that number back to the small residual they found in item 8.

ELL supports

Pre-teach "regression," "residual," and "correlation" using a simple scatter plot with a drawn line and one point marked to show the gap (residual) between the point and the line. Provide the formulas as fill-in templates where students substitute numbers into labeled blanks rather than recalling the symbols from memory.