Reading passage Grade 8 Social Studies & Civics

Ashgrove's Stormwater Fee: Paying for the Rain That Runs Off

A grade 8 civics passage on how one city used a stormwater fee and green infrastructure to cut sewer overflows, with questions on policy and fairness.

Objectives

  1. Students will explain how a stormwater fee is designed and why it charges some properties more than others.
  2. Students will weigh competing fairness arguments about a local water policy using evidence from the text.

Vocabulary

Combined sewer overflow
In some older cities, one pipe carries both sewage and rainwater. A combined sewer overflow happens when a big storm fills the pipe past what the plant can handle, and the extra mix spills into a river untreated.
Green infrastructure
Green infrastructure uses soil and plants, like rain gardens, green roofs, and street trees, to soak up rainwater where it falls instead of piping it away. It copies the way nature handles rain.

Also: runoff, stormwater fee, permeable

Teacher overview

This passage explains how one city, the fictional city of Ashgrove, used both green infrastructure and a fee to deal with stormwater. It introduces combined sewer overflows, green infrastructure, and the idea of charging property owners based on how much rain their land sends into the pipes. Teachers can assign it to connect a concrete local policy to larger questions about fairness and who should pay for a shared problem. The questions ask students to find stated facts and to weigh two sides of a real civic argument.

Answer Key

  1. Answer: It is when a combined pipe system, carrying both runoff and sewage, fills past its limit in a heavy storm and overflows the mix into the nearest river. The passage explains that the mixture of rainwater and untreated sewage spills out through overflow outlets.
  2. Answer: It was based on how much hard surface a property had. The passage states that more pavement means more runoff, so those properties paid more.
  3. Answer: Any two of: rain gardens, permeable pavement, and planted strips along roads. The passage names each as a way to soak up rain where it falls.
  4. Answer: Because the store's wide parking lot sent more runoff into the system than a small house did. The strongest supporting detail is the passage's statement that a property with more pavement places a bigger load on the pipes.
  5. Answer: It gave people a reason to change how their land handled rain, because owners who added a rain garden or permeable pavement got a lower fee. The passage explains that less runoff from their land meant a smaller bill.
  6. Answer: The fair side argues that a big parking lot really does create more runoff, so the biggest load-causers should pay the most. The unfair side argues that rain is no one's fault, so charging more for a large lot is not deserved. Both reasons appear in the passage's paragraph on the fee debate.

Differentiation

Support

Provide a simple labeled diagram showing a paved lot with fast runoff next to a rain garden that soaks water in, and let students point to it while answering questions 1 through 3. Allow questions 1 and 2 to be answered with short phrases rather than full sentences.

Extension

Ask students to write a short paragraph proposing one change to Ashgrove's fee that would make it fairer, and to defend the change using at least one detail from the passage about how the fee was designed.

ELL supports

Pre-teach runoff, permeable, and green infrastructure with pictures before reading. Provide a two-column organizer labeled "fair" and "unfair" so students can sort the two arguments from the fee debate before writing their answer to question 6.